Footbridge Media

footbridgemedia.com

Standing, discipline by discipline

Footbridge Media ranked separately on five disciplines, measured 12 Sep 2026.
DisciplineStandingWhat that rests on
Local SEO7 of 15Scored 64 of 100 on the published local seo rubric (dedicated surface, method specificity, published depth, named practitioner, and their own demonstration surface), measured 12 Sep 2026.
Technical SEO5 of 15Scored 68 of 100 on the published technical seo rubric (dedicated surface, method specificity, published depth, named practitioner, and their own demonstration surface), measured 12 Sep 2026.
Content5 of 15Scored 69 of 100 on the published content rubric (dedicated surface, method specificity, published depth, named practitioner, and their own demonstration surface), measured 12 Sep 2026.
Link building12 of 15Referring domains, 528, and Domain Rating 64. Both Ahrefs estimates, pulled 12 Sep 2026. This is the volume half of one criterion; the composition split has not been run.
Tracking and attribution4 of 13Scored 15 of 20 on the measurement stack running on their own site. Confirmed by: html only.

The measurement stack on their own site

  • Analytics or tag manager: present gtag loader observed on one fetch, not reproduced on a second
  • Call-tracking provider identified: present CallRail
  • Number swapping confirmed: present swap.js alongside CallRail
  • Consent handling: not detected

What we looked for and did not find

  • A consent manager on their own site.

Why absences need two paths

Published corpus

562 URLs declared in their sitemap. Corpus size informs the content rubric rather than standing alone as a score. How scoring works.